
One of these days, atheists both here in the state of California and nationwide, will realize that some things are not to messed with: the wording on paper currency and the Pledge of Allegiance.
And curiously enough, it took a court in the most liberal of cities – San Francisco – to render the ruling that has atheists cursing coast-to-coast.
A federal appeals court upheld on Thursday the use of the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance and “In God We Trust” on U.S. currency, rejecting arguments that the phrases violate church and state.
According to Judge Carlos Bea in the 2-1 ruling:
“The Pledge is constitutional.”
“The Pledge of Allegiance serves to unite our vast nation through the proud recitation of some of the ideals upon which our Republic was founded.”
A common sense ruling for a not-so-common argument by the losing party.
In addition, the court on Thursday ruled 3-0 and upheld the inscription of the national motto “In God We Trust” on coins and currency, saying that the phrase is ceremonial and patriotic, not religious.
In the interest of full disclosure and outing an atheist, the plaintiff is Michael Newdow, a resident of Sacramento. He won a couple rulings in local courts back in 2002 and in 2005 – all because students of the school that his daughter attended recited the Pledge of Allegiance. And as luck would have it, a judge in Sacramento back in 2005 ruled in the atheist’s favor.
Nonetheless, he got a legal smackdown from the court, and hopefully, Newdow will just shrink, wither and just go away.
Filed under: Temple Tidbits









