Lots of backlash from the Copenhagen climate change summit (Climategate, nations agreeing to disagree, etc.) finally came to the forefront when the U.N.’s top climate change official, Yvo de Boer, made the decision to resign.

The main reason? Mainly because the nations (all 193 of them) who were dumb enough to attend the climate change summit in Copenhagen, for reasons known only to them and God, couldn’t put together a money/power grab climate change deal together. Which, in the grand scheme of things, is a blessing in disguise.

But then again, he contributed either directly or indirectly to his own demise when he admitted in an interview to the BBC that there’s been no global warming within the past 15 years. Ouch!

The resignation of de Boer simply illustrates the sham that global warming is. the meeting of the 193 assembled nations wasn’t so much a concern about climate change as it was a way for them to attempt to cobble together some sham agreement that is more about money and eventually, a one-world government.

de Boer’s resignation also brings to the forefront the ineffectiveness of the U.N. The organization is just a cover for a select group of nations that want to have this “one-world order”, which inevitably would be the start of a non-democratized world. In other words, they prefer the Socialist and/or Marxist model of government.

If the United States was smart, they would do  two things: quit paying membership dues to the U.N., and better yet, resign from the United Nations altogether. The U.S. would be better off with their non-participation in this sham organization.

Jim sent this in:

In the wake of President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address and of recent and ongoing climate science scandals, the President should appoint an independent panel of experts to evaluate the purported climate change-national security link, urged Admiral James A. Lyons, Jr., USN (Ret.), former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet and Chairman of the Center for Security Policy’s Military Committee.

“The supposed relationship between climate change and national security is too important an issue to be driven by unsubstantiated claims, tainted by scandal and to result in counterproductive policies,” Admiral Lyons stated in the open letter.

Lyons’ letter points out that both the ongoing Climategate scandal involving senior United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scientists and the IPCC’s recent admission-of-error and retraction of the claim that Himalayan glaciers could disappear by 2035 have rocked confidence in often-repeated assertions that capping emissions of greenhouse gases will improve national security.

“Before we adopt policies that affect military-preparedness and national security, it is imperative that we act on honest assessments of the best available information,” Admiral Lyons said.

“When it comes to the climate change-national security link and the cap-and-trade legislation now being considered by Congress, any confidence in scientific pronouncements that may have existed in 2009 does not exist in 2010,” the decorated Naval commander stated.

“In light of media reports and President Obama’s  emphasis on the climate change-national security link in his State of the Union address, I am asking the President to acknowledge recent developments and to appoint an expert panel whose independence is beyond reproach to sort out fact from fiction,” added Admiral Lyons. 

Opponents of legislation such as the so-called Cap-and-Trade bill are quick to remind President Barack Obama’s political allies that besides being destructive to the US economy, such legislation is based — wholly or partially — on faulty or manipulated science.

“These liberal-left politicians and activists see an opportunity to use so-called global warming as a means to push forward their Marxist philosophy. Part of the agenda is to take away wealth from the American people and give it to Third-World countries,” said political strategist Mike Baker.

The evidence provided by the intercepted emails of renowned climatologists has created one of the biggest scandals in the last decade — if not the century, according to Baker.

Thousands of emails and documents allegedly “stolen” from the University of East Anglia (UEA) and posted online indicate that researchers massaged figures to mask the fact that world temperatures have been declining in recent years.

These leaked emails provide compelling evidence that much of what is being touted as scientific fact is in reality erroneous, fraudulent, and perhaps criminal if participating scientists used their phony research to acquire government grants.  

Several emails contained discussions about how to best portray data sets, among other topics. Scientists maintain their comments have been taken out of context, but those who fiercely oppose the climate change thesis argue the emails invalidate all the research.

Even the leftist newspaper The Guardian described its newsroom’s shock over discovering that the documents revealed scientists were “cooking the books,” in order to prove the earth is warming at an alarming rate.

Actor Danny Glover believes that the Haitian earthquake was caused by climate change and global warming. Do us all a favor, Danny: STFU. Really – STFU.

Jim sent this in:

World leaders spouting their usual “sky-is-falling” rhetoric during their international climate change summit in Copenhagen this month, along with their supporters, are ignoring evidence of fraud and corruption exposed in emails exchanged by leading “climate experts.”

Last Friday, Congressman Chaka Fattah (D-PA), a member of the House Appropriations Committee and its subcommittees that oversee funding for federal science, commerce, energy and water development agencies, issued a statement regarding President Obama’s global warming diplomacy and upcoming appearance on December 9 at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen

In his statement, Rep. Fattah said, “Give President Obama credit for changing the game on climate change. His environmental diplomacy will finally place the United States at the forefront of efforts to save our planet.”

“President Obama’s pledge to reduce United States greenhouse gas emissions is in line with targets in House legislation that I supported upon passage in June. Those targets lay down a marker for the Senate. We in Congress owe it to the American people and in fact the world community to send the President a comprehensive, action-oriented bill- a necessary complement to his global leadership in climate change,” said the congressman.

Opponents of so-called Cap-and-Trade environmental legislation are quick to remind Obama’s political allies that besides being destructive to the US economy, such legislation is based — wholly or partially — on faulty or manipulated science.

“These liberal-left politicians and activists see an opportunity to use so-called global warming as a means to push forward their Marxist philosophy. Part of the agenda is to take away wealth from the American people and give it to Third-World countries,” said political strategist Mike Baker.

The evidence provided by the intercepted emails of renowned climatologists has created one of the biggest scandals in the last decade — if not the century, according to Baker.

Thousands of emails and documents allegedly “stolen” from the University of East Anglia (UEA) and posted online indicate that researchers massaged figures to mask the fact that world temperatures have been declining in recent years.

These leaked emails provide compelling evidence that much of what is being touted as scientific fact is in reality erroneous, fraudulent, and perhaps criminal if participating scientists used their phony research to acquire government grants.  

Several emails contained discussions about how to best portray data sets, among other topics. Scientists maintain their comments have been taken out of context, but those who fiercely oppose the climate change thesis argue the emails invalidate most scientific research.

Even the leftist newspaper The Guardian described its newsroom’s shock over discovering that the documents revealed scientists were “cooking the books,” in order to prove the earth is warming at an alarming rate. 

What is even more shocking is that the authors of the emails are not just any old bunch of academics. “Their importance cannot be overestimated, What we are looking at here is the small group of scientists who have for years been more influential in driving the worldwide alarm over global warming than any others, not least through the role they play at the heart of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),” stated Baker. 

Baker points to the senders and recipients of the leaked emails saying that they are a “who’s who” of science. Their ranks include Doctors Michael Mann, Ben Santer, Kevin Trenbeth, and even Al Gore’s climate guru, Dr. James Hansen. Gore used Hansen’s studies in his Oscar-winning motion picture An Inconvenient Truth.

Even after being caught with the “smoking gun,” they and their defenders have offered every possible excuse for concealing the background data on which their findings and temperature records were based. Most incriminating of all are the emails in which scientists are advised to delete large chunks of data, which, when this is done after receipt of a freedom of information request, is a criminal offense.

According to the emails, scientists involved secretly discussed ways they could manipulate the scientific peer review process so that skeptic could not get their articles and papers published in scientific journals. skeptical papers had no access to publication.

For example, when Dr. Thomas Wigley of the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research complained that paleo-climatologist Hans von Storch was responsible for “the publication of crap science ‘in order to stimulate debate’” and that they “must get rid of von Storch” as an editor of the journal Climate Research.

Armed with allegedly phony proof against Storch, they succeeded in getting von Storch to resign.

The scandal is also raising questions about members of the news media being complicit in covering up ClimateGate. For example, a BBC meteorologist and climate change expert, Paul Hudson, admits he was sent the leaked emails a month prior to their discovery by bloggers, radio and television talk hosts and other interested parties.

Meanwhile in the US, major media outlets continue to ignore the story, according to the media watchdog group, Accuracy in Media. 

Since the emails where first discovered, ABC had only mentioned the story once, on Sunday’s This Week with George Stephanopolous, and CBS and NBC still has never reported the leaked emails on the morning or evening news, according to AIM. 

“Rather than focus on this huge scientific scandal, the timing of which is critical considering the cap and trade legislation stalled in the Senate and the upcoming Copenhagen meeting supposedly intended to combat global warming—the mainstream media have done their best to ignore it.

“The scandal involves the destruction of data, the manipulation and cover-up of data, and a plan to punish scientific journals that might dare to publish the views of skeptics of the man made global warming theory. They realize that a full airing of the facts would likely undermine an important part of President Obama’s agenda, and expose the corruption of a significant part of the scientific establishment,” writes AIM’s contributing editor Allie Duzett.

Alden Meyer, director of strategy and policy for the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in an interview with the Washington Post from that Obama’s decision to go to Copenhagen suggests that “he’ll be here at the end to help seal the deal.”

“The Washington Post is one of the culprits in this enormous cover up,” accuses Mike Baker. “And why aren’t reporters flocking to Al Gore for his reaction to this proof that climate change is a farce?”

For years, Al Gore has played the role of a modern day Paul Revere, sounding the alarm regarding potential consequences of global warming in order to gain public attention. Whenever there is a story related to environmental issues, reporters quote Gore. In fact, Fox News Channel on Saturday morning reported that conservatives in Hollywood are demanding that Gore be stripped of his Oscar for his documentary that served as a vehicle to ratchet up global warming fears. 

“But putting aside the fact that Gore has honed his public speaking skills, the fly in the ointment is that he’s a fraud. Like the very global warming movement to which he has attached himself, he’s a snake oil salesman whose sales pitch is laced with scare tactics designed to push the public into embracing a radical, carbon-free agenda that rests on a combination of half-truths and outright fabrications,” alleges AWR Hawkins, a conservative writer who holds a Ph.D. in military history from Texas Tech University and writes for Pajamas Media.

“And Gore’s fraudulence is not only seen in the fact that he pawns a lie, but also in the fact that he refuses to abide by the very lie he pawns,” quipped Dr. Hawkins.

To illustrate that the United Nations is still attempting to incorporate a one world order of sorts internationally, their scum leader, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon said on Tuesday that despite the leaked emails from a British university, it doesn’t change his of the U.N.’s view that climate change is accelerating due to humans.

His take? Ki-Moon rambled:

“Nothing that has come out in the public as a result of the recent email hackings has cast doubt on the basic scientific message on climate change and that message is quite clear — that climate change is happening much, much faster than we realized and we human beings are the primary cause.”

The Secretary-General, for reasons only known to him and the God he worships, seems to still be under the notion that cap-and-trade is the way to go in order to get that “one world government” ball rolling. And as anyone knows, carbon emissions are an every day fact of life.

He conveniently forgets that there are worse polluters on this earth than the United States. Countries such as China, India and arguably Russia automatically come to mind. Another thing – carbon dioxide is harmless. When we exhale, carbon dioxide is emitted. When a cow farts, the same thing. Belching? Same thing.

So as you can see, “global warming” is codespeak for wealth redistribution around the world and a myth (scam?). There’s no reason whatsoever why we here in the United States (the biggest bankroller of the U.N.) should be party to any of the schemes that the organization is cooking up. As a matter of fact, I propose that as soon as Obama is booted out of office in 2012, the United States renounce their membership in the United Nations. We didn’t become a superpower by suscribing to any of the tenets in the U.N. charter last time I checked.

Just because we believe in capitalism doesn’t mean that we have to acquiesce to the other member-nations and go in lockstep to their schemes. That’s how Socialists and Communists roll. We’re above that.

One thing that you can say with certainty is that the Hollyweird set and the liberals have something in common: they come into a discussion rarely armed with facts. Ed Begley, Jr. validates my point perfectly as he espouses the myth (fraud?) that is climate change. If you like liberal babbling, then you’ll love this. Enjoy!

I will assume that the vast majority of you out there don’t watch CNBC; but for those misguided souls who do, then you may have caught “The Kudlow Report” on that lamestream channel on Tuesday (November 24). Long story short, fill-in host Simon Hobbs (Simon who? Exactly!) did his best to interrupt guest Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) as both were discussing the emails that were unveiled after a hacker accessed the files over at the Climate Research Unit at University of Anglia in the U.K.

I’m not going to ruin a perfectly good segment here, so tune in to the above video. You’ll thank me later.