Subscribe: Posts | Comments | E-mail

Jim sent this in:

Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, a loyal Democrat and liberal-left ideologue, blamed the Fort Hood massacre –perpetrated last Thursday by a radical Muslim soldier –on firearms.

“Mayor Daley is deplorably capitalizing on the outrage at Fort Hood to push his gun prohibition agenda,” said Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

“This is the height of moral bankruptcy from a man whose administration was sued Wednesday morning by the Chicago inspector general over apparent interference with an investigation into possible wrongdoing by current and former city employees.”

The Mayor of one of the most — if not the most – politically corrupt cities in the United States, Daley reacted to the Fort Hood shooting by telling reporters, “Unfortunately, America loves Guns. We love guns to a point where that, uh, we see devastation on a daily basis. You don’t blame a group.”

“You don’t blame guns, either,” Gottlieb fired back. “You hold the perpetrator responsible for his crime, not the instruments he used. Would Daley blame cars for the highway carnage created by drunk drivers?”

Gottlieb went on to say, “Perhaps the real culprit here is former President Bill Clinton. The Washington Times revealed this morning that after he took office in 1993, the Army, under Clinton, instituted a ban on the carrying of firearms by military personnel on their bases. As a result, soldiers have been disarmed and left vulnerable to this kind of attack. Using Daley’s logic, he should blame Clinton for the Fort Hood massacre. That makes more sense than blaming guns.”

Mayor Daley is proud of his involvement with a group called Mayor Against Illegal Guns, says political strategist Mike Baker.

“As with our current president — who hails from Chicago — Daley is your typical Illinois politician who talk like Hippies but behave like the Mafia,” he quipped. 

Gottlieb and other gun-rights activists believe Daley has an agenda that he shares with other anti-gun extremists: They will exploit any tragedy to pursue their goal of public disarmament and destruction of the Second Amendment. Whether it is the assassination of a Seattle police officer, the murder of 13 people at Fort Hood, or the horrible body count of crime victims that has piled up in Chicago under Daley’s regime, they will dance through the blood toward the nearest sympathetic microphone to push their cause.

“I’m not a member of any gun-rights group, but I’m not buying [Mayor] Daley’s analysis. The Fort Hood murders were perpetrated by a radical Islamist. In this case, he used firearms. He could have used any other method — IED [improvised explosive device] or bio-weapon – and still would have killed innocent people. Perhaps more than the 13 deaths attributed to the killer’s attack,” explains former NYPD detective and US Marine Sid Frances.

“America must ignore the ravings of anti-gun fanatics,” he concluded, “who are so blinded by a hatred for individual liberty and personal protection that they cannot see how foolish and petty they have become,” said Gottlieb.

With more than 650,000 members and supporters nationwide, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (www.ccrkba.org) is one of the nation’s premier gun rights organizations. As a non-profit organization, the Citizens Committee is dedicated to preserving firearms freedoms through active lobbying of elected officials and facilitating grass-roots organization of gun rights activists in local communities throughout the United States.

I think most of us already know about the Freddie Mac fiasco; for those who aren’t familiar, Freddie Mac is the mortgage giant that was involved in the accounting scandal whcih led to a huge management shakeup, huge fines and the scorn of their management – and played no small part in contributing to the nation’s economic malaise.  But what a lot of people do not know is that President Obama’s chief of staff - Rahm Emanuel – had a seat on Freddie Mac’s board of directors.

And get this, folks – Emanuel, in 14 months at Freddie Mac – earned $320,000 during his 14-month stint there.  And as it turned out, did very little while at the agency.  I’ll get to that in just a minute; but first a little sypnosis about Emanuel. 

At one time, he was an investment banker – a decade ago, to be exact.  He then turned that into a 3-term stint in the U.S. House after helping Chicago mayor Richard Daley and former US president Bill Clinton get elected.  Now he is Obama’s frontman – chief of staff, if you will.  Nonetheless, he was named to the Freddie Mac board of directors back in February 2000 by Clinton, who Emanuel had served as White House political director; the board under which Emanuel served met no more than six times a year.  But unlike most board members, Emanuel had no duties with any of the board’s working committees.

Upon joining Freddie Mac’s board, Emanuel and other new directors received $380,000 in stock options plus a $20,000 annual fee; while Emanuel was there, the Freddie Mac board was told by executives there of a plan of using accounting tricks designed to mislead shareholders about outsized profits that the government-chartered firm was receiving from risky investments.  The overall goal of all of this was to push earnings onto the books in futre years, ensuring that Freddie Mac would appear profitable on paper for years to come and to also help maximize annual bonuses for the company brass.

Also during his 14 months at Freddie Mac, the company had created a scheme to enhance its political standing; as it turned out, Freddie Mac was fined by the Federal Election Commission a record $3.8 million for using corporate resources to host fundraisers for politicians.  Not surprisingly, Emanuel was a beneficiary of one of these fundraisers after he left the Freddie Mac board and ran in 2002 for a seat in Congress from Chicago’s north side. 

And there are the financial disclosure statements required of those who are US House members; Emanuel’s showed that he made $320,000 while at Freddie Mac and also showed that he sold some Freddie Mac stock, worth anywhere between $100,001 and $250,000 – the document did not state whether Emanuel profited from the sale.  My best guess is that he did.  Here’s where it gets sticky – controversial, even.

According to Armando Falcon Jr., head of an oversight agency for Freddie Mac, he stated that the Freddie Mac did most of their work in committees; however, according to proxy statements, no assignments were issued to Emanuel and two other board members, while most of the other board members drew 2 assignments each.  So basically, he got paid for doing nearly nothing.

Yet another Democrat who had involvement in the current economic mess that our country.  And you know what?  I am willing to bet you that Obama did absolutely no vetting of Emanuel.  It is amazing to me that in the president’s mantra of “transparency”, that there has actually been little to none of that at all.  Once again, this is more ammunition that can and should be utilized for the 2010 election cycle.

Folks, I know that I am getting real repetitive here, but I’ll keep repeating this until it gets the desired result.  We need to get off our asses and get proactive as the 2010 election cycle draws real close.  Seats in the House, Senate and some governorships are at stake here.  And how can you get involved?

It’s easy – get involved in the tea parties that are gaining steam nationwide.  Or you can be involved in an election campaign involving your local congressman/woman and/or senator.  But most importantly, get out there and vote.  That was what killed the Republicans back in 2008 and we do not need a repeat performance of the last election cycle. 

Or you can do the alternative and sit on your ass and do nothing – which is what the Democrats want more than anything.  To do absolutely nothing is to basically approve of any and everything that Obama and the Democrats are trying to put into place.  I want my country back – the country that I used to know.  The one that believed in capitalism, smaller government and less spending.  I don’t want Socialism, do you?  If you truly love your nation, then you don’t want Socialism, either.  All I am asking is that you get involved and help take your country back.